Archive for the ‘Blow Molding’ Category

Barrier Blow Molding is Growing at a Fast Pace! Could Your Products Benefit?

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

The demands for improving extrusion blow molded containers are rapidly increasing. A recently published forecast by Mastio & Company, a consulting firm in St. Joseph, MO, estimates 6.2% growth per year in plastic containers for blow molded food and beverage. Comparable or even slightly higher expansion is predicted for segments of consumer packaging that include pharmaceutical, health care, and cosmetics. The demand for EVOH is growing at a rate of at least 10% a year with 70% of that growth being in food packaging. 2003 year-end statistical summaries from the Society of the Plastics Industry indicate that of all plastics-related equipment categories: “Blow Molding showed the most promise, realizing increases in units shipped and dollar value of shipments of 19.4 percent and 10.5 percent respectively.”

Growth of that magnitude is fueled by diverse dynamics. Consumers demand that products must be convenient to use. Retailers want great shelf appeal and containers that are easy to stock and handle. Manufacturers want lower costs combined with improved performance in the filling line and shipping chain. Product formulators want longer shelf life from containers, frequently requiring barrier properties for moisture, gas, oxygen, chemicals and other elements. Converters want faster production rates, designs that lend themselves to higher speed production and more repeatable, high quality capabilities. This trend is especially strong in food, diary and beverage packaging. “Recently we have seen more interest in multi-serving packages versus the smaller single serve containers,” says Jeff Newman, VP of Wilmington Machinery.

Solving such packaging challenges may seem overwhelming. To meet diverse and many times conflicting specifications, companies are exploring multi-layer and barrier alternatives. In that regard, working together with material suppliers and machinery manufacturers often leads to the best and fastest solutions. For instance, Wilmington Machinery, barrier specialist in high speed blow molding machinery, has identified numerous multi-layer options to help its customers solve packaging problems such as improving shelf appeal, reducing costs, and creating better barrier protections.

Barrier protection for longer shelf life and improved product formulations is easily achieved by today’s improved materials using multi-layer configurations. Some packaging can be improved by adding a layer of the new highly effective moisture barrier material to the inside. A thin layer of flavor barrier material can be added and matched to a specific product need. A chemical solvent barrier can be achieved easily by adding a thin layer of specialized material. Oxygen barriers to extend shelf life and protect products are routinely accomplished through multi-layering methods as evident by the recent success of the plastic coffee canister in North America.

The blow molding industry is moving toward multi-layer and barrier applications. “Coextrusion blowmolded, barrier, single serve containers can be produced at a lower cost than comparable containers made using coinjection, barrier, stretch blowmolding,” says Bob Miller of Business Development Associates, a packaging consulting firm. “In addition the growing trend of using full body shrink labels eliminates any issues previously associated with gloss or clarity requirements of the container; thus, potentially favoring extrusion blowmolded polyolefin containers over PET.” Product designers, material suppliers and machinery manufacturers are now integral in the conversion process for testing, material evaluations and package performance. To meet the demand for new product development, Wilmington has equipped its laboratory with two multilayer machines for packaging and industrial applications. Additional process engineering, design engineers and a new field service manager support the overall turnkey efforts. “The focus at Wilmington Machinery is delivering the finished part. That means providing complete blow molding production lines that meet customers’ expectations, regardless of how demanding,” says Newman, a 20-year veteran of high output blow molding systems. “Innovations in multi-layer blow molding systems and materials have opened the door for cost effective conversion and package improvement opportunities that were not possible 5 years ago.”






Blow Molding Process Comparison

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

If you are new to blow molding or if you have been in the industry for 30 years, it can still be confusing as to what type of blow molding machinery or process is best for your next application. I have been fortunate in my career to design and build machinery for every type of blow molding process. For your information I consider there to be 7 primary machinery processes for packaging applications.

Shuttles (Continuous extrusion)
Wheels (Continuous extrusion)
Injection Blow
Injection Stretch Blow (1 Step)
Reheat Stretch Blow (2 Step)
Reciprocating screw (Intermittent extrusion)
Accumulator Head (Intermittent extrusion)

Some people may refer to them differently and some may argue several of these should be grouped together, but for sake of discussion, we will use this grouping. Further definition of the technologies, along with pros and cons for each process, can be found in the links above.

  Shuttle Wheel Injection Blow Injection Stretch (1-Step) Reheat Stretch (2-Step) Recip Screw Accumulater HD
HDPE Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes
PP Yes Yes Yes Sometimes No Yes Yes
PET No No Yes Yes Yes No No
PVC Yes Yes Yes No No No No
Styrene No No Yes No No No No
Multilayer / coinjection Yes Yes Difficult Difficult Difficult No Difficult
IML Yes Yes No No No Difficult Difficult
Handleware Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes
Injection Finish Good Fair Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair Good
In-machine Deflashing Yes No N/A N/A N/A No No
Flashless Process No No Yes Yes Yes No No
Small Bottle<100 ml

low/med vol.

Yes No Yes No No No No
Small Bottle<100 ml

high vol.

Yes Maybe Yes No No No No
Med. Bottle(1 litre)

low vol.

Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No
Med. Bottle(1 litre)

high vol.

Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No
Large Bottle(4 litre)

low vol.

Yes Yes No No No Yes No
Large Bottle(4 litre)

low vol.

No Yes No No No Yes No





Blow Molding Process Comparison: Wheels (Continuous Extrusion)

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Rotary Wheel Blow Molding Machinery

The rotary wheel blow molding machines are the machine of choice for very high volumes of containers for markets such as liquid detergent and juice in North American markets. Wheels are typically chosen over shuttles because of processing ease (and cost) due to single parison technology and lower cost per container for high-volume applications. This is especially true for coextrusion and multilayer applications. Machines can be designed to handle a wide range of container sizes, but are typically committed to a narrow range of container variation after built. Because the containers are blow with a needle (instead of blow pin), it is not unusual to blow containers in a neck to neck configuration to increase the production output. Wheels come in various configurations including indexing, continuous motion, vertical (like a ferris wheel) and horizontal (like a merry go round). Some even now have the capability to produce calibrated neck containers, such as a reciprocating screw (Intermittent extrusion). Most, however, rely on downstream trimming equipment to trim and finish the container.

PROS:

  • Lowest cost method for high volume production requirements
  • Simple design and controls for maintenance
  • Single parison well suited for multilayer application for repeatability and cost
  • Easy to utilize IML
  • Can achieve very high production volume from a single machine

CONS:

  • Typically can not be converted to different number of cavities after being built
  • High investment requires commitment to high volume production situations
  • Requires secondary trimming and finishing equipment

Back to Blow Molding Process Comparison.






Blow Molding Process Comparison: Injection Stretch Blow (1 Step)

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Injection Stretch Blow (1-Step)

This process is almost entirely dedicated to PET and more recently, PP applications. The process is very similar to Injection Blow except for two areas: 1) the preforms are not transported on core rods but instead held by the neck finish and 2) during the blowing process, rods stretch the preform prior to blowing to orient the material. For materials such as PET this biaxial orientation substantially increases the physical properties to weight ratios. Major manufacturers include Aoki and Nissei.

PROS:

  • Scrapless process meaning no flash to trim and no regrind
  • Allows for biaxial orientation for strength and clarity
  • High quality injection molded neck finish
  • Typically suited for .5 litre up to 20 litre
  • Capable of PET non-carbonated beverage containers
  • Capable of lower volume production applications
  • Does not require separate preform mold and machine

CONS:

  • High tooling cost
  • Minimum cycle typically 18-20 seconds
  • Can not produce carbonated beverage containers (Not enough biaxial orientation due to high preform temperature at blowing)
  • Not suited for polyolefins
  • Can not blow handleware
  • Difficult to run coinjection or multilayer

Back to Blow Molding Process Comparison.






Blow Molding Process Comparison: Shuttles (Continuous Extrusion)

Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Shuttle Machinery – Extrusion Blow Molding

This is the most popular type of machinery for blow molding high density polyethylene (HDPE) and Polypropylene Plastic (PP) containers around the world. Literally thousands are sold every year. A shuttle machine consists of either single or dual clamps that shuttle (or slide) from under the die head to a blow pin assembly for blowing. The machines come in all sizes and configurations from single cavity to as many as 20-30 and bottle sizes from a few ounces up to a 10 litre jerry can. Included in the shuttle group is the long stroke type blow molding machine. Popular manufacturers include Bekum, SIG, Automa and Magic to name only a few of hundreds.

PROS:

  • Relatively inexpensive for small to medium volume production requirements
  • Deliveries container with calibrated neck
  • Typically trims container prior to exiting machine
  • Most flexible in container size and number of cavities
  • Can handle coextrusion
  • Can handle all type of container shapes including handleware

CONS:

  • Can not process PET material
  • Hydraulics and controls can be complex
  • Requires multiple machines for very high production volumes unless
  • Multiple parisons can be difficult to process consistently

Back to Blow Molding Process Comparison.